The illustrations from this 18th century text are both beautiful and intensely disturbing. They come from a time when science was separating superstition from medical practice with the development of teratology, the study of deformities — but retained the unfortunate word “monster” as a medical term.
Recent research shows how pesky parasites may be affecting the behaviour of up to a reported 40% of the population.
A picture of the small animal was put together by scientists after examining thousands of fossilised and living mammals to construct an evolutionary “family tree”.
A few scientists are at least open to the possibility that a large, unidentified primate may indeed be stalking the forests of the Pacific Northwest (as well as dozens of other localities around the world). Certainly, it has acquired more credibility as the years go by, which at least suggests there may be something to the idea. So what sort of ‘evidence’ is there to suggest the big guy is really out there? Here is my top ten reasons why you should, if not believe, at least remain open to the prospect that Bigfoot is more than just a myth or a salesman for beef jerky. VIA: –UNIQUE DAILY–
CONSPIRAPORN! 